On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:02:45AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> If it's a 1U server, I can tell you already that you are screwed, and
> that you need a bigger chassis with more SCSI/SAS disk bays, at least 8
> disks given your load of 250-300 msgs/sec.
Does this application really need Postfix and a queue? Why not just
turn the script into an SMTP server that pre-forks a fixed number of
copies and loops receiving/processing email? For 200-300 msgs/sec on
an I/O constrained server with a single "mailbox", one really does not
need Postfix, and can't afford the I/O cost of a local queue.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
