> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:57:09AM -0600, LuKreme wrote: > > On 21-Sep-2009, at 08:47, Victor Duchovni wrote: > >> It may be useful to highlight for review parameter names that are not > >> known to "postconf -d" (i.e. not built-in). Also any parameters defined > >> more than once (the last value wins, but there really should be just one > >> setting of each parameter). > > > > It would be great if postconf -n put all the unknown parameters at the > > end, after all the known ones. > > Right now, it does not report them at all, that could be construed to be > useful also. Yes, "postconf" could use a couple of extra features. > What might be especially useful would be to check, in addition to format erros, whether, on the face of it main.cf shows possible:
1. Open Relay 2. Appropriate configuration of subsidiary tools e.g policyd 3. Appropriate command sequences There are many more such choices. Alternatively how about be a web based tool (similar to the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) which might be called PFixWAT <chuckles> that creates main.cf!! David
