On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Victor Duchovni <victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:27:45PM -0400, fursink wrote: > >> Sep 17 13:25:55 tmail postfix/smtp[27618]: EBC6F87D49: >> to=<testu...@yahoo.com>, relay=e.mx.mail.yahoo.com[216.39.53.1]:25, >> delay=3.7, delays=0.02/0/0.64/3, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 ok >> dirdel) >> Sep 17 13:25:55 tmail postfix/qmgr[27609]: EBC6F87D49: removed >> >> still no indication slow transport is working. > > Postfix 2.3 does not support the rate_delay feature, this is new with > 2.5 and works correctly as of 2.5.6. > > -- > Viktor. > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. > > To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit > http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: > <mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> > > If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not > send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put > "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly. >
Would the fact that this is 2.3.3... prevent the transport from working at all? I would think the transport should still function even without rate-delay, though I will now look into building an upgrade if that's what it takes. related - if slow transport is working, will the log show "postfix/postfix-slow" rather than "postfix/smtp"? - Andrew
