Magnus Bäck a écrit : > On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 22:38 CEST, > Eduardo Júnior <ihtrau...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Magnus Bäck<mag...@dsek.lth.se> wrote: > > [...] > >>> The receive_override_options setting is enough. Multiple cleanup >>> daemons were necessary before receive_override_options was introduced.
other than that, they can be used to implement different header checks. >> Right, but theoretically if I would have two cleanup daemons >> configured of the same way, my flow of messages would be more fast, >> 'cause all the messages wouldn't waiting only through a queue. >> But how i have just a qmgr daemon, this second cleanup daemon wouldn't >> be necessary, correct? > > Postfix will start cleanup processes as necessary based on the load. > All messages are not fed through the same "physical" cleanup process > even if you only have one cleanup line in master.cf. > and anyway, as the saying goes, premature optimization is the root of all evil. don't tune unless you measure and you find that you have a performance problem.
