Hi, On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Magnus Bäck<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 22:05 CEST, > Eduardo Júnior <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Reading [1], there is a possibility of tuning performace of the Postifx. >> For this I wouldn't headers, mime, nested and body checks twice, >> configuring another cleanup instance. >> >> But, I have two smtp instances: >> - the first receive and send messages from/to internet >> - the second receive messages from my amavisd-new >> >> And in the second smtp instance I defined this: >> >> -o >> receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks,no_milters > > Avoid the "instance" terminology here since that has a distinct and > different meaning in Postfix. You just have two smtpd daemons, or > smtpd listeners.
OK. > >> checks done by daemon cleanup, right? > > Yes. > >> So, I really need another cleanup instance? >> Or this my option of the second smtp instance already say that? > > The receive_override_options setting is enough. Multiple cleanup > daemons were necessary before receive_override_options was introduced. Right, but theoretically if I would have two cleanup daemons configured of the same way, my flow of messages would be more fast, 'cause all the messages wouldn't waiting only through a queue. But how i have just a qmgr daemon, this second cleanup daemon wouldn't be necessary, correct? > -- > Magnus Bäck > [email protected] > []'s -- Eduardo Júnior GNU/Linux user #423272 :wq
