What I'm wondering is - which alternative to use instead of BDB?
On 21.11.25 09:04, Claus Assmann via Postfix-users wrote:
(tiny)cdb if read-only is sufficient.
Depends. bdb supports concurrent usage including writes, while cdb does not support writes at all (must be rbuilt from scratch).
That makes BDBs useful in some cases, so I'd be also curious what it can be replaced with.
Comdb2 seems to be replacement of it. https://bloomberg.github.io/comdb2/overview_home.html -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Silvester Stallone: Father of the RISC concept. _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
