If it ain't broken, why stop using it?
> What I'm wondering is - which alternative to use instead
> of BDB?
(tiny)cdb if read-only is sufficient.
> There's gdbm, which falsely marked as "broken" in postfix
> just because it uses one file instead of two in old dbm,
Maybe this was inherited from sendmail?
GDBM GDBM does not work with sendmail because the additional
security checks and file locking cause problems. Unfortunately,
gdbm does not provide a compile flag in its version of ndbm.h so
the code can adapt. Until the GDBM authors can fix these problems,
GDBM will not be supported. Please use Berkeley DB instead.
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
