On May 10, 2025 5:57:34 PM UTC, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users <postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote: >Mime-version was listed as a signed header but was absent. > >I suspect his header checks cleaned that out. > >Note that having a header listed in the H equals list, but having that header >be absent is legal, but I don’t know why the signing software would say it’s >signing that header when it’s not there. >
Generically (probably not relevant here), 'signing' a non-existent header field will cause the signature verification to fail if one is later added. There may be times when that's desirable. Scott K _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
