W dniu 2009-04-14 23:11, mouss pisze:
Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
* MacShane, Tracy<tracy.macsh...@airservicesaustralia.com>:
Then you won't receive some genuine messages, both bounce and
non-bounce.
Try the ips.backscatterer.org RBL; it works well for us.
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg57402.html
They are retarded. mail.charite.de is listed in it.
and I guess postfix members would be bothered to block:
camomile.cloud9.net[168.100.1.3]
english-breakfast.cloud9.net[168.100.1.7]
$ host 3.1.100.168.ips.backscatterer.org
3.1.100.168.ips.backscatterer.org has address 127.0.0.2
$ host 7.1.100.168.ips.backscatterer.org
7.1.100.168.ips.backscatterer.org has address 127.0.0.2
so if one uses this list, then
- use a whitelist (dnswl and possibly local WL)
- use it in smtpd_data_restrictions to avoid blocking SAV sources. while
you may hate SAV, it's different than backscatter.
I think that you're missing something.
I'm getting emails from this list as:
<owner-*******...@********.org> -> <warl...@lesniakowie.com>
Where's the place where emails would be rejected? Is this list doing SAV?
I'd even ask - is ANY list doing SAV? It's hard for me to imagine
sending thousands of emails to users who had already confirmed email
address during "registration".
Pawel Lesniak
