On 14/2/2025 11:41 π.μ., Florian Piekert wrote:
...
could

reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname

in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions be responsible, since there are dns resolution issues for the hostname.
...

Thanks Florian for the reply.

Interestingly, dns reverse record query does work on the server:

[root@mailgw1 postfix]# dig -x 154.52.2.232

; <<>> DiG 9.11.36-RedHat-9.11.36-16.el8_10.2 <<>> -x 154.52.2.232
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 59302
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;232.2.52.154.in-addr.arpa.     IN      PTR

;; ANSWER SECTION:
232.2.52.154.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN      PTR smtpfra7.fortimailcloud.com.

;; Query time: 391 msec
;; SERVER: 62.217.126.164#53(62.217.126.164)
;; WHEN: Fri Feb 14 12:16:49 EET 2025
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 95

Nevertheless, the warning does gets logged by postfix.

Yet I think this is not critical, since it's just a warning. If the session was terminated due to reverse record check, it would be logged like in this case :

Feb 14 04:02:59 mailgw1 postfix/smtpd[3627408]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[103.35.70.77]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [103.35.70.77]; from=<xxxx...@client.scholargatherings.com> to=<xxxx...@noa.gr> proto=ESMTP helo=<server77.rdnsdomain1.co.in>

Any other hints are welcome!

Thanks,
Nick

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

Reply via email to