That is indeed plausible! Forget about the first proposal. What do you think about the other one? Not for the next release… (I‘m really looking forward to a stable v3.10, so it‘s great news that you have frozen the code 👍🏻)
… but as an idea for the future releases? > Am 05.02.2025 um 19:53 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users > <postfix-users@postfix.org>: > > ?mer G?ven via Postfix-users: >> Hi! >> >> For the next release (3.10), I'd like to propose that unknown tags >> returned by TLS policy socketmap servers are logged as warnings, >> but never regarded as an invalid policy. This would avoid delivery >> errors introduced by future additions, when an older Postfix version >> doesn't support a tag yet. > > With arbitrary application protocols it is often OK to skip a "newer" > field in a response or request. > > However, this being a security policy, information must not be > ignored. (I just deprecated an unused attribute, and that is OK). > > Postfix 3.10 is in a code freeze, the last non-bugfix change went > in yesterday. > > Wietse > _______________________________________________ > Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org > To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
