Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in <4ymsrw3pqbzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: |Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: |> Btw why do you say "odd"? SRV has the possibility for port 0 ever |> since it was created, yet port 0 never was a valid port. So to |> the contrary even (hah!) we finally live it in full, what was only |> envisioned in the past. If that isn't progress, i do not know. | | if _smtps._tcp.DOMAIN exists and the port is 0, then the host | asserts it supports STARTTLS [on port 25] | |I'm sorry, but can we please avoid proposals that repurpose some |"invalid bit pattern" case to signal that a domain supports: | |- a feature that is not part of the protocol (smtps) that is mentioned | in the request, | |- on a port (25) that is not mentioned in the request or response.
Ok i change it so default IANA port 25 means STARTTLS, any other Implicit TLS. I myself did indeed not mean SRV OR MX OR A/AAAA but instead MX aka target domain name known THEN peek SRV (same domain name) for TLS support (and port) THEN A/AAAA. But it seems that ship sailed many years ago. Hm. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) | |In Fall and Winter, feel "The Dropbear Bard"s pint(er). | |The banded bear |without a care, |Banged on himself for e'er and e'er | |Farewell, dear collar bear _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
