Hi! It seems that some my statements on this list are difficult to understand somehow. While I usually mean one context, my statements are being interpreted in another context.
Postfix documentation has always been an excellent example of clear brevity to me, a high standard level which is almost unachievable elsewhere. The manpages are written in a way which is a) short, and b) crystal clear, and c) nothing unnecessary (see a). The same is true for replies by Wietse on this list. I always tried to go this route, to make as short and clear statements as possible, but I always end up with both long and unclear. It's a good challenge for me to (try to) keep up to these high standards. Apparently it doesn't work as good as I'd like it to be. I'm sorry for this. I'm trying to improve. Also, we all learn (hopefully :) - including learning how others view current situations, so it is possible to adopt ones writing to ways how the intended audience interpreting it. I haven't been reading this list for many years (since 2010 or so), and the way I express my thought apparently needs some tweaking to be read like how I wanted it to be read. I'm trying. Thank you for your patience. /mjt _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
