On 2024-11-01 at 18:34:36 UTC-0400 (Sat, 02 Nov 2024 06:34:36 +0800)
Adriel via Postfix-users <adriel@myemail.click>
is rumored to have said:

There is a mail system said,

host east.xxx.com[3.138.xx.xx] said:
554 5.7.1 <adriel@myemail.click>: Sender address rejected: We reject all
    .click domains.

I am just not sure, does the .click domain have low reputation on internet? so other providers choose to just reject it?

To a some extent, yes. It is probably far more common for mail systems to use more nuanced tools like SpamAssassin that use scoring of many attributes to make a spam/ham decision. In those cases, you won't get an explicit statement like the above, but rather just rejection or acceptance without details. SpamAssassin in particular does include *.click in its lists of suspect domains for both transit systems and payload URIs, based on the analyses done by our contributing systems of actual email.

There's a reason for this sort of rejection. The people who have managed the .click gTLD have done a terrible job of preventing abuses. The overwhelming majority of mail claiming to be from a .click domain is unsolicited garbage. For the systems I manage, it has been 100.000% over the lifetime of the .click gTLD.

what's the high reputation domains then, .com/.net/.org?

There are no real "high" reputation gTLDs. A majority of email from any gTLD is spam because about 90% of all email is spam (this varies widely by target address.) You won't get any *affirmative* benefit from any particular gTLD. However, you can be fairly sure that no system of any significant scale will reject solely on the basis of having a com/net/org/edu domain. Country code TLDs are also fairly safe, aside from those which have been colonized into general availability (cc, co, io, tk, etc.)

The "new" gTLDs with reputation problems all started their lives with abuse-magnet policies (free trial periods for domains and/or promotional pricing) and/or have chronically failed to police abusive registrants. By not investing in trust and safety issues, the operators of those gTLDs created their own bad situation: full of spammers and without good tools for thwarting them.



--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

Reply via email to