Dnia 10.04.2024 o godz. 10:22:52 Bill Cole via Postfix-users pisze:
> I have been using spamhaus, spamcop, sorbs as the RBL providers for
> antispam.
> But some of the customers speak to me about the FP issues caused by RBL.
> Do you think the three RBL above are reliable in a practical system?
Those are three of the best, but you have to understand that they are
complicated and may not fit YOUR needs.
Spamhaus offers multiple DNSBLs which each has a vey specific definition,
[...]
SpamCop is based on actual feeds of spam from many sources, and when they
list an IP, you can be certain that it recently sent spam. They do not
[...]
SORBS is also informed by multiple sources of spam, and like SpamCop they
do not exempt mixed sources. Like Spamhaus, they have both independent
DNSBLs and an aggregated list that uses distinct return values for each
[...]
You really need to look at your DNSBL choices carefully and with an
understanding of your users and their needs. You may want to consider
On 10.04.24 17:39, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
Myself, I use Spamcop, SBL-XBL list from Spamhaus (only this one),
Why not zen? In includes PBL..
for SORBS, I use only their "Dynamic IP" list.
sorbs dyna is supposed to contain the same IP addresses as spamhaus PBL
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Chernobyl was an Windows 95 beta test site.
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
