Dnia 10.04.2024 o godz. 10:22:52 Bill Cole via Postfix-users pisze: > > I have been using spamhaus, spamcop, sorbs as the RBL providers for > > antispam. > > But some of the customers speak to me about the FP issues caused by RBL. > > Do you think the three RBL above are reliable in a practical system? > > Those are three of the best, but you have to understand that they are > complicated and may not fit YOUR needs. > > Spamhaus offers multiple DNSBLs which each has a vey specific definition, [...] > > SpamCop is based on actual feeds of spam from many sources, and when they > list an IP, you can be certain that it recently sent spam. They do not [...] > > SORBS is also informed by multiple sources of spam, and like SpamCop they > do not exempt mixed sources. Like Spamhaus, they have both independent > DNSBLs and an aggregated list that uses distinct return values for each [...] > > You really need to look at your DNSBL choices carefully and with an > understanding of your users and their needs. You may want to consider
Myself, I use Spamcop, SBL-XBL list from Spamhaus (only this one), and as for SORBS, I use only their "Dynamic IP" list. That combination seems to work very well for me. -- Regards, Jaroslaw Rafa r...@rafa.eu.org -- "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub." _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
