On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:41:07PM -0800, Linux Advocate wrote: > i have been thinking of using sorbs instead of spamhaus because sorbs > allows sites with upto 100k user to connect to them but with spamhaus > u are limited to 100users max. Sorbs has a detection rate of about 68% > and i was thinking of beefing our spam wall with grey listing.
I can't speak about RBLs I don't use. The main strength of SpamHaus is: - PBL lists ~500 million dynamic IPs with a remarkably low FP rate. - XBL lists additional botnet nodes with a remarkably low FP rate. - SBL lists spammer networks with a very low FP rate. I've not heard of any RBLs that are as effective as Zen. Yes, Zen is only free for small (personal use) sites and charges a fee to keep the infrastructure running for larger sites. The data-feed costs were not unreasonable last time I looked. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.