On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:41:07PM -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:

> i have been thinking of using sorbs instead of spamhaus because sorbs
> allows sites with upto 100k user to connect to them but with spamhaus
> u are limited to 100users max. Sorbs has a detection rate of about 68%
> and i was thinking of beefing our spam wall with grey listing.

I can't speak about RBLs I don't use. The main strength of SpamHaus is:

        - PBL lists ~500 million dynamic IPs with a remarkably low FP rate.
        - XBL lists additional botnet nodes with a remarkably low FP rate.
        - SBL lists spammer networks with a very low FP rate.

I've not heard of any RBLs that are as effective as Zen. Yes, Zen is
only free for small (personal use) sites and charges a fee to keep the
infrastructure running for larger sites. The data-feed costs were not
unreasonable last time I looked.

-- 
        Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.

Reply via email to