if you're connecting from a windoze machine, check the firewall (and
antivirus, netsecurity, whatever crappy stuff) settings of the windoze
machine. I've seen instances where outgoing connections to port 25 were
being blocked by some Symantec product, or even the windoze firewall
itself... (iirc)




Michael De Groote
ICT-coordinator Sint-Pietersschool Korbeek-Lo
ICT-support Sancta Maria Basisschool Leuven


On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>wrote:

>  Also check SElinux if you are running this. It may prevent changes to the
> port config from taking place.
> You can see entries in the logfile called /var/log/messages
>
> Regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, Ph.D
> Global Information Highway Ltd
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* D G Teed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Paul Cocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Cc:* postfix users list <postfix-users@postfix.org>
>  *Sent:* Friday, November 21, 2008 2:47 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Postfix listening on 25, unable to telnet to 25 - my first
> config
>
>
>   Paul Cocker schrieb:
>>
>>>
>>>>>> Definitely nothing in between, of that I'm certain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there any tools which will give me more information
>>>>>
>>>> about attempts
>>>>
>>>>> to connect to a port on a remote host?
>>>>>
>>>> use tcpdump for that purpose
>>>>
>>>> please try
>>>>
>>>> $ telnet $IP_OF_SMTP_HOST 25
>>>>
>>>> and show exactly, what you get
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I ran windump in the background and did a telnet to the IP, however a
>>> findstr on the output file contains no matches. If I do the same thing
>>> using the server name the only matching output in the dump is when the
>>> server performs a name lookup, after that there are no matching entries
>>> by IP or name.
>>>
>>> Am I doing something wrong?
>>>
>>
> There are a few things that can make postfix listen only locally.
>
> One is firewall.  You say it isn't an issue.
>
> On the postfix machine, if it is a Unix machine, use lsof -Pni to
> verify what ports and addresses master is listening on.
>
> If it is only listening to 127.0.0.1 then you have a problem with
> inet_interfaces, or else the look up of the host name listed
> in inet_interfaces.  On many Linux machines, the host
> resolution order is hosts, dns, and so a bad entry
> on /etc/hosts can sting you.
>
> Make sure you don't have 127.0.0.1 set up with the internet host
> name of the server in /etc/hosts.  It should be only localhost next to
> 127.0.0.1   I've seen Redhat installs with this messed up.
>
> --Donald
>
>

Reply via email to