On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:05 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > D G Teed wrote: > >> [snip] >> Is there anything more I can be doing? >> >> > what is your problem exactly? are you listed on spamcop?
We are not listed on spam cop. There have been a couple of external reports I've seen in the last year. When I respond, I like to know I'm working with the best set up available. > if so, what IP are you talking about? You need to know my IP as much as you need my address or phone number. It is irrelevant. We are not in block lists. I know how to check, and we have enough volume here that I'd learn pretty quickly if there was a problem. > what makes you believe you are listed because of backscatter? What makes you believe I'm listed? I got a single report of a complaint. Have you not used the spamcop web interface before? and why do you send backscatter (and what kind of bs)? Why do you take a combative stance? We send non-delivery responses. If someone emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED], it will reject, saying that user doesn't exist. Our users expect this feature. If we told them bad addresses will cause email to be lost without notification, they would not be happy. > > Does anyone feel Spamcop's position on backscatter too simplistic? >> > > no evidence, no conclusion. > Here is what they say... http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html#bounces --Donald
