Yves Kreis a écrit : > Yes it is about postfix address rewriting (which can be done as well > though sender_canonical_maps afaik). > > And yes it is about Postfix becoming an open relay. The rule > /^(.+)+pt.lu:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > forwards all mails sent to xxx+pt.lu:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > So the server theoretically is an open relay, however you need to know > the password.
are you rewriting the sender or the recipient? If you rewrite the sender, then there is no "forwarding". if you rewrite the recipient, then that's forwarding. and anyway, even if you talk about forwarding, this isn't technically open relay. This is forwarding. it's the same as if a user has a .forward. This may create problems (if you forward spam) but technically speaking, this is "forwarding spam", not "open relay". terminology is important if you want us to talk about the same thing. > > How important is the risk of this choice? > > Best Regards, > Yves
