Kenneth Marshall a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:58:52PM +0200, mouss wrote:
>   
>> Johan Andersson wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>> We are thinking to implement some form of greylisting at one of our sites 
>>> and wonder which one of the many flavors out there
>>> that this group have found reliable?
>>> I know postfix has its builting one from a while back, but feel unsure if 
>>> it viable for our site... postgrey and gps seems they added
>>> some features that mighe be usable for us... like automatic trunking of 
>>> the list
>>> I just starting to read up on it so I feel very noobish at the moment :)
>>> We have six MTA's that receive approx 1million emails a day (total) on 
>>> roundrobined addresses.
>>> Anyone else out there with some experience on the different greylisting 
>>> models?
>>>       
>> try (Cami's) policyd. it's written in C as a single threaded daemon. it 
>> uses mysql (myisam unfortunately!). Cami is no more working on it, but it's 
>> stable enough (and Cami used it in an ISP environment).
>>
>> it has other features (rate limiting, blacklist, whitelist, ...)
>>
>> check
>>      http://www.policyd.org/
>> and look at the "Old policyd V1".
>>
>>     
>
> If you do not have anything in place, I would recommend looking at
> the version 2 policyd that is more database backend agnostic. It is
> written in perl and uses DBD/DBI to connect to the backends. That
> way you can avoid being locked in to a particular database backend
> be it MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, ...
>
>   

I don't know the status of the V2 (I looked at a long time ago, but it
was still a in development/design stage).


note that some people don't want perl based solutions. For good or bad
reasons, but let's avoid a long debate  ;-p



Reply via email to