urx, friday syndrom... More correct example:
Why? The normal recipient (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would get a mail with Received: from ... by mail.example.com for [EMAIL PROTECTED] while a BCC recipient (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would get a mail with Received: from ... by mail.example.com for [EMAIL PROTECTED] -stefan- On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 12:58 +0200, Stefan Palme wrote: > > > Is there a way to enforce postfix to always insert a "from ..." part > > > on its Received: header? > > Of course I meant "for..." part... > > > > No, that would violate the privacy of BCC recipients. > > Why? The normal recipient (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would get a mail with > > Received: from ... by mail.example.com for [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > while a BCC recipient (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) would get a mail with > > Received: from ... by mail.hell.net for [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I don't see any privacy violation. What exactly do you mean > with "privacy of the BCC recipients" ? > > Regards > -stefan- > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dipl. Inf. (FH) Stefan Palme email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://hbci4java.kapott.org http://converter-db.de http://myamavis.kapott.org icq: 36376278 key fingerprint: 1BA7 D217 36A1 534C A5AD F18A E2D1 488A E904 F9EC -------------------------------------------------------------------
