On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:50:44 +0200 "Marcel Grandemange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do entirely agree with you're statement however we have many MANY
> clients that have been with us a while and because they are all
> remote and not always IT literate, its easier implementing what
> worked and add the better methods for new clients.
>
> It's simply to avoid the hassles of clients phoning in and us having
> to loose time to users questions!
>
> I have got pop-before-smtp now working with DB4 !!! , Just need to
> test everything still works as it was.
Please don't top post. If you don't know what that means, Google for it.
Simply because a portion of your client base uses a depreciated method
is not in itself a valid reason to continue to support it. Getting them
switched over to a more secure method is not as hard as you seem to
think it might be. In any event, you might well end up supporting two
different authorization methods which I would personally find less then
desirable.
--
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Difficulty for Every Solution.
Motto of the Federal Civil Service
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
