-----Original Message----- From: Marcel Grandemange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:50 PM To: 'Jorey Bump' Subject: RE: Postfix & pop-before-smtp
I do entirely agree with you're statement however we have many MANY clients that have been with us a while and because they are all remote and not always IT literate, its easier implementing what worked and add the better methods for new clients. It's simply to avoid the hassles of clients phoning in and us having to loose time to users questions! I have got pop-before-smtp now working with DB4 !!! , Just need to test everything still works as it was. -----Original Message----- From: Jorey Bump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 11:41 PM To: Marcel Grandemange Cc: 'postfix users list' Subject: Re: Postfix & pop-before-smtp Marcel Grandemange wrote, at 08/25/2008 05:11 PM: > Now postfix was built from ports with DBD and I think it uses version 4. > > And from ive gathered I THINK pop-before-smtp uses 1.... > > So what now! > > Ive looked everywhere on how to compile pop-before-smtp to work with v4.... > Nothing > > Anyone suggest a way out this hell! Or a work around? Do you really need the aggravation? I understand why POP-before-SMTP might seem appealing (I even wrote my own a long, long time ago), but it's now considered a hack with significant disadvantages. Since almost all modern clients support more secure methods of SMTP AUTH, your time will be much better spent implementing that, instead. Can you still demonstrate a need for POP-before-SMTP? __________ NOD32 3381 (20080822) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com
