On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 05:11:04PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 March 2008 16:57:20 Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 02:47:04PM +0100, Simon Bertrang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:57:52AM +0000, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:05:13AM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 02:22:52AM +0300, Vadim Jukov wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Wow! But... What port version did you made diff from?
> > > > >
> > > > > oops. try this instead.
> > > > ...
> > > > > -PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}p1v0
> > > > ...
> > > > > +PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}
> > > >
> > > > Can we remove the ``v'' suffix when it was once added?
> > > >
> > >
> > > No, otherwise the version would actually go backwards.
> > >
> > > If a package needs to go back to an older version than available, ``v''
> > > takes precedene over version and patchlevel. It can never go back.
> > >
> > > For instance, the p5-DBD-SQLite package went from 1.12 -> 1.13 -> 1.12v0
> > > and the following update to 1.14 had to be 1.14v0.
> >
> > so, for the rest of the life of these ports, we will always have to tack
> > on v0?
> >
> > seems (much) less than ideal.
>
> That makes no sense at all. It should be 1.12 -> 1.13 -> 1.12v0 -> 1.14.
How do you make a difference then if it was 1.12 -> 1.13 -> 1.14 ->
1.12v0 -> 1.15?
Regards,
Markus
