On 2008/03/11 17:11, Brad wrote: > > so, for the rest of the life of these ports, we will always have to tack > > on v0? > > > > seems (much) less than ideal. > > That makes no sense at all. It should be 1.12 -> 1.13 -> 1.12v0 -> 1.14.
How can that work? v# is used to override any higher version number. So it could equally be 1.12 -> 1.14 -> 1.12v0, or even 1.12 -> 2.0 -> 1.12v0.
