On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:00:03PM +0000, Kurt Miller wrote: > On Jan 27, 2025, at 4:50 PM, Kurt Mosiejczuk <k...@cranky.work> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:16:57PM +0000, Kurt Miller wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 2025, at 3:49 AM, Theo Buehler <t...@theobuehler.org> wrote: > > > >>>> Thoughts? If looks good, testing with a bulk build on amd64 and sparc64 > >>>> would be > >>>> helpful to ensure I didn't miss a port that needs a REVISION bump. > > > >>> This went through an amd64 bulk with no fallout. I think you should land > >>> this and if there's sparc64 fallout, we can deal with it in tree. > > > >> Ok. Thanks for the bulk build and review. I have committed it and will > >> review the sparc64 bulk build logs for any missing REVISION bumps needed. > > > > Lots of fallout. I have domething that keeps the logs from sending out > > before > > my review if we have less than 9000 packages. This run has only produced > > 6998 > > packages. I'll let these logs through, but we're probably looking at > > multiple > > runs of whackamole doing it this way. > > Can you tar up the logs so I can search them and see what’s going on quicker?
Look at https://cranky.work/sparc64/2025-01-26/summary.log Two obvious things with a huge chain of dependencies are nghttp3 -> curl -> ... glib2,bootstrap -> ... I bumped them. But if such crucial things are missed, this is indeed going to take a while.
