On Jan 27, 2025, at 4:50 PM, Kurt Mosiejczuk <k...@cranky.work> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:16:57PM +0000, Kurt Miller wrote: >> On Jan 23, 2025, at 3:49 AM, Theo Buehler <t...@theobuehler.org> wrote: > >>>> Thoughts? If looks good, testing with a bulk build on amd64 and sparc64 >>>> would be >>>> helpful to ensure I didn't miss a port that needs a REVISION bump. > >>> This went through an amd64 bulk with no fallout. I think you should land >>> this and if there's sparc64 fallout, we can deal with it in tree. > >> Ok. Thanks for the bulk build and review. I have committed it and will >> review the sparc64 bulk build logs for any missing REVISION bumps needed. > > Lots of fallout. I have domething that keeps the logs from sending out before > my review if we have less than 9000 packages. This run has only produced 6998 > packages. I'll let these logs through, but we're probably looking at multiple > runs of whackamole doing it this way.
Can you tar up the logs so I can search them and see what’s going on quicker? -Kurt
