On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:16:57PM +0000, Kurt Miller wrote: > On Jan 23, 2025, at 3:49 AM, Theo Buehler <t...@theobuehler.org> wrote:
> >> Thoughts? If looks good, testing with a bulk build on amd64 and sparc64 > >> would be > >> helpful to ensure I didn't miss a port that needs a REVISION bump. > > This went through an amd64 bulk with no fallout. I think you should land > > this and if there's sparc64 fallout, we can deal with it in tree. > Ok. Thanks for the bulk build and review. I have committed it and will > review the sparc64 bulk build logs for any missing REVISION bumps needed. Lots of fallout. I have domething that keeps the logs from sending out before my review if we have less than 9000 packages. This run has only produced 6998 packages. I'll let these logs through, but we're probably looking at multiple runs of whackamole doing it this way. --Kurt
