drmatt wrote: > The focus is on windows thread locking semantics i think, so multi core > is suspect.
Yes to multi core but only in so far as making things happen quicker. There is no thread locking as all data is passed through pipes/named pipes which provides the synchronism with faad and flac reading from a named pipe and writing to a pipe. The socketwrapper outside threads taking data from LMS and writing to faad input pipe and taking flac output pipe and writing to LMS output pipe. > i5s don't support hyperthreads, so these are all real independent > cores. Yes some do -my laptop win7 system has a i5-3210m (see http://ark.intel.com/products/67355/Intel-Core-i5-3210M-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-3_10-GHz-rPGA ) and shows up as 4 CPUs when monitoring loads. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104672 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
