Every software if a copy, not the original. Originals are only created by the process.. Wise people truncate the last part of the process and call it a master disk or master software and then sell their copies!!
Unless the same process of manufacturing is applied for all the pieces manufactured... it is a copy.. So what piece of software anybody sells is a copy not the original. **and companies like $ who have master disks** can be successfully (& tactically) be labeled **copyleft**, because they never leave their premises :-) whatever you name it cloning a disk.. or whatever it is still a exact replica, meaning a copy!! This could be called a **definition flaw.. or perceived flaw in definition** All arguments on this point are (un :-) welcome as long as they are in the context of Linux and copying and legality of copying -- ______________________________________________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail@plug.org.in) List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.
