Every software if a copy, not the original.

Originals are only created by the process..  Wise people truncate the
last part of the process and call it a master disk or master software
and then sell their copies!!

Unless the same process of manufacturing is applied for all the pieces
manufactured... it is a copy..

So what piece of software anybody sells is a copy not the original.

**and companies like $ who have master disks** can be successfully (&
tactically) be labeled **copyleft**, because they never leave their
premises :-)

whatever you name it cloning a disk.. or whatever it is still a exact
replica, meaning a copy!!

This could be called a **definition flaw.. or perceived flaw in definition**

All arguments on this point are (un :-) welcome as long as they are in
the context of Linux and copying and legality of copying

--
______________________________________________________________________
Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List:      (plug-mail@plug.org.in)
List Information:  http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail
Send 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for mailing instructions.

Reply via email to