Hi, |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:53:15 +0100, Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> said:
AK> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34:07PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: AK> [jackd2 over jackd1] >>> jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well. >> >>I see no such thing on their webpage, nor in their mailing list >>(although I don't pay that much attention there). AK> This was also new to me. I never came across such a recommendation. Okay, so I guess it was only my misunderstanding on my part. I don't recall exactly where I read it, but I remember something about new features being implemented only in jack2, though this might not be entirely true anymore. >>Maybe asking upstream is a good idea. AK> I already did, the answer was: "Huu, this is a political question." AK> Which in turn means: technically speaking, it's fine to use either of AK> the versions. So let's use the best one of them or the one we feel meets the needs of our users most. Ciao! Free _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
