On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote: > RT> there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now... > > I'm sorry, I think I missed it, can you point me to it?
hm. it seems the message at http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2010-March/008415.html is archived defectively. In that mail, I wrote this: ,---- | From this discussion, I gather the following options: | | A) stick with jack1 | B) have jack2 in squeeze | C) have both jack1&jack2 in squeeze | F) further discussion | | With such an fictional ballot, I'd vote: | | A>B>F>C | | | If you care to comment on this issue, please participate in the vote, so | that we can assemble a report for the release team quickly. `---- So far, only fabian as replied: ,---- | Am 18.03.2010 15:35, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: | > If you care to comment on this issue, please participate in the vote, so | > that we can assemble a report for the release team quickly. | | I am indifferent between A and B, just because I am lacking knowledge | about jack internals. But either of both is IMHO better than | maintaining both packages, which will require a lot of new | infrastructure and redundant work and further discussion only slows | things down even more. So my vote is: | | (A<>B)>C>F | | My vote should not be decisive for the choice between jack1 and jack2. `---- -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
