Hi, |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:08:10 +0100, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> said:
RT> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote: RT> there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now... >> >>I'm sorry, I think I missed it, can you point me to it? RT> hm. it seems the message at RT> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2010-March/008415.html RT> is archived defectively. In that mail, I wrote this: Thanks for reporting. So, my opinion is that we should definitely have jack2 in squeeze, because it seems to be better (that is more features, and as stable as jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well. FWIW I've been using it daily for nearly one year, and also used for a few production projects. Adrian, what's your take at this point? I guess as far as jack is concerned you're one of the most knowledgeable among us. Ciao! Free _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
