Thanks for mentioning me. I would just like to point out that I made FuzzyWorld in both Pharo and VSE, but since all my applications were in VSE (which I have been using since 1985!) I have brought it to VSE for graphic content and tools I had already developped. As you can see in the first slide of my presentation, FuzzyWorld is an extension of the Smalltalk classes and not of VSE or Pharo; both can use it. Anyway, I am a Pharo member, so I have been surprised for comments on my presentation. If I can express my opinion, this discussion is based on nothing: in my opinion Pharo is Smalltalk; everything else is VAPOR WARE.
Lorenzo -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] Per conto di horrido Inviato: mercoledì 5 febbraio 2020 19:51 A: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Oggetto: Re: [Pharo-users] About "it's not pharo but smalltalk" Yes, these are two completely different issues... - Pharo is Smalltalk - you don't want general Smalltalk discussion polluting this forum I get it. But as I point out here <http://forum.world.st/Fuzzy-Thinking-in-Smalltalk-tp5111111p5111191.html> , Pharo is in a unique position and I would hope that the Pharo community is willing to participate in evangelizing Smalltalk. If there is truly another avenue that is as effective, I'm all ears. Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >> On 5 Feb 2020, at 18:50, horrido < > horrido.hobbies@ > > wrote: >> >> It would be like trying to deny that Clojure, Scheme, and Racket are >> not LISP. Only an imbecile would claim they're not. > > I am pretty sure the mailing lists of Clojure, Scheme or Racket don't > want you to go there to discuss Common Lisp or Emacs' Lisp or to talk > about general lisp revivals. > > Especially, they would not want you tell them what they should or > can't do based on their history. -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
