Re: [Pharo-users] About "it's not pharo but smalltalk"

[Sven Van Caekenberghe]

> On 5 Feb 2020, at 18:50, horrido <horrido.hobb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It would be like trying to deny that Clojure, Scheme, and Racket are not
> LISP. Only an imbecile would claim they're not.

I am pretty sure the mailing lists of Clojure, Scheme or Racket don't want you 
to go there to discuss Common Lisp or Emacs' Lisp or to talk about general lisp 
revivals.

Especially, they would not want you tell them what they should or can't do 
based on their history.