Yes, these are two completely different issues... - Pharo is Smalltalk
- you don't want general Smalltalk discussion polluting this forum I get it. But as I point out here <http://forum.world.st/Fuzzy-Thinking-in-Smalltalk-tp5111111p5111191.html> , Pharo is in a unique position and I would hope that the Pharo community is willing to participate in evangelizing Smalltalk. If there is truly another avenue that is as effective, I'm all ears. Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >> On 5 Feb 2020, at 18:50, horrido < > horrido.hobbies@ > > wrote: >> >> It would be like trying to deny that Clojure, Scheme, and Racket are not >> LISP. Only an imbecile would claim they're not. > > I am pretty sure the mailing lists of Clojure, Scheme or Racket don't want > you to go there to discuss Common Lisp or Emacs' Lisp or to talk about > general lisp revivals. > > Especially, they would not want you tell them what they should or can't do > based on their history. -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
