> That wording is an insult to all people that support a leftist vision of the world.
Or maybe you're too easily offended and the problem lies with you. On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 3:56 AM Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > I carefully worded my reply: > > saying "I have no interest in supporting a left-wing snowflake “Code of > Conduct”. > > - is off topic > - is political > - implies a value judgement > > I tried to not reason against it, I am just saying that it has no place > here. > > > On 20 Sep 2019, at 12:30, PBKResearch <pe...@pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Sven > > I think all your complaints against John Pfersich are misconceived: > > 1. He is talking about the content of the code, which is exactly the > topic of the thread. > > 2. He is claiming that the code as drafted has a political slant. This > may be true, false or a matter of opinion, but to discuss whether it is so > is not in any way introducing politics. > > 3. I see nothing in his words which makes a value judgement about > anybody. > > I see a censoriousness in your comments which is worrying. Just recently > you said, 'Guns have no place in a civilised society', which was certainly > a value judgement, specifically about John Pfersich. Please stop. > > > > Peter Kenny > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pharo-users <pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org> On Behalf Of > Sven Van Caekenberghe > > Sent: 20 September 2019 10:11 > > To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> > > Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Code of Conduct > > > > > > > >> On 20 Sep 2019, at 06:17, john pfersich <jpfers...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I have no interest in supporting a left-wing snowflake “Code of > Conduct”. > > > > You are violating the implicit rules of engagement in this mailing list: > you are going off topic, you are using this platform to talk about politics > and you are giving value judgements about others. Please stop. > > > > > > >
