I carefully worded my reply: saying "I have no interest in supporting a left-wing snowflake “Code of Conduct”.
- is off topic - is political - implies a value judgement I tried to not reason against it, I am just saying that it has no place here. > On 20 Sep 2019, at 12:30, PBKResearch <pe...@pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote: > > Sven > I think all your complaints against John Pfersich are misconceived: > 1. He is talking about the content of the code, which is exactly the topic of > the thread. > 2. He is claiming that the code as drafted has a political slant. This may be > true, false or a matter of opinion, but to discuss whether it is so is not in > any way introducing politics. > 3. I see nothing in his words which makes a value judgement about anybody. > I see a censoriousness in your comments which is worrying. Just recently you > said, 'Guns have no place in a civilised society', which was certainly a > value judgement, specifically about John Pfersich. Please stop. > > Peter Kenny > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pharo-users <pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org> On Behalf Of Sven Van > Caekenberghe > Sent: 20 September 2019 10:11 > To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Code of Conduct > > > >> On 20 Sep 2019, at 06:17, john pfersich <jpfers...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I have no interest in supporting a left-wing snowflake “Code of Conduct”. > > You are violating the implicit rules of engagement in this mailing list: you > are going off topic, you are using this platform to talk about politics and > you are giving value judgements about others. Please stop. > >
