> On 28 Nov 2018, at 09:38, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>> i) How do I reify the value of an RB(Valuel|Literal|LiteralValue)Node?
>>> RFValueReification does not work, and there is no reification for literal,
>>> value, or literal value nodes.
>
> This is now fixed. All subclasses of RBValueNode with the exception of
> Cascade now support #value. (Cascade: see below).
>
>>> ii) How do I reify arguments and results of blocks? I tried reify context
>>> for the block body #before and value for #after block "last", but I often
>>> run into the problem of no reification for literals.
>
> I added issue tracker entries:
...
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22703/Block-execution-arguments-reification
> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22703/Block-execution-arguments-reification>
>
I added a first fix and simple tests for this, it is in the latest version.
-> when putting a link on a block body, one can reify #arguments
TODO:
=> clean up the situation block definition vs block body
=> test in real world situations (might not yet work for more complex
cases, e.g. nested blocks)
=> support #value in after links.
Marcus
