Hi Craig, Great, thanks! The minimal example seems to load fast enough. Do you think there is a potential to slim it down even further for a production system that uses the DOM as its UI, ie remove morphic and others and use the image in headless mode?
Thanks for the offer to work together on the Pharo port. It is too early for me to commit to that, but I definitely like the idea. Right now I'm just checking out. I'd like to use Pharo's (or Squak's) interactive development workflow to develop single page web apps and mobile apps in a reliable manner. Is there a way to run the IDE in a separate window from the actual application, so that the UI would behave as in production during development? I'm especially thinking of responsive web applications here. (If not then perhaps putting them into divs next to each other might be a decent workaround) Cheers, Siemen Sent from my iPhone > On 19 Jul 2018, at 14.25, Craig Latta <cr...@blackpagedigital.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Siemen-- > >> What is the status of Caffeine now - is it production-ready with >> Pharo, and how large is a minimal (not development) image with >> everything required to run a production system - i.e. what would be >> the load time of a Caffeine web app? > > I'm using Caffeine in production with Squeak; there are a few bugs > to deal with in Pharo. Would you like to work together on it? > > A minimal system is a few hundred kilobytes, depending on the > application. The VR app I'm doing now is fairly large and loads in 10 > seconds. A small app should take about two seconds. The mini image demo > at [1] is a good approximation. > > Please feel free to join in on Caffeine issues, at [2]. > > > thanks, > > -C > > [1] https://squeak.js.org/demo/simple.html#fullscreen > [2] https://github.com/ccrraaiigg/ccrraaiigg.github.io/issues > > -- > Craig Latta > Black Page Digital > Amsterdam :: San Francisco > cr...@blackpagedigital.com > +31 6 2757 7177 (SMS ok) > + 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS) > >
