On 4 December 2017 at 12:15, horrido <horrido.hobb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Speaking of which, one of my readers said he tried out Pharo recently and
> found the documentation wanting. He was expecting a Getting Started guide at
> the pharo.org website and couldn't find one. So he had to blunder around a
> bit.

Thanks for passing that on.  Documentation has been improving but a
quick start would probably be useful.  Its the sort of thing I look
for in other systems
to skim to evaluate how interesting they are and if they are
worth investing time in.

cheers -ben

> I told him he could've looked at "Chapter 2: A quick tour of Pharo" in the
> *Pharo by Example 5* book, but he's right. There ought to be something
> obvious at the pharo.org website that helps a newbie get Pharo up and
> running, understand how to basically use the Pharo IDE, and write the
> standard "Hello World" program.
>
> I checked out squeak.org and found the same documentation issue! Why is
> this???
>
>
> Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas-2 wrote
>> Documentation is going well. In fact the stuff that kept me away of
>> Squeak, despite of its potential was the lack of documentation. "The
>> artifact is the curriculum" was to powerful but too heavy. You need a
>> way to understand how to deconstruct and navigate the artifact that is
>> usually anchored with the culture you have (books and reading) instead
>> of only launching inspectors os browsing the code. Grafoscopio is my
>> attempt to fill that gap between the world of objects/simulations and
>> the world of scripts/documents.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Offray

Reply via email to