> On 14 May 2017, at 15:40, horrido <horrido.hobb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >> I think a stylised balloon is not bad, it just has to be less complex, >> more logo like, more abstract. > > I've taken your comment to heart and I believe I've come up with the ideal > logo: > > <http://forum.world.st/file/n4947093/hotairballoon-red-300.png> > > Beautifully abstract. Nice and simple.
Yes, that is better. Personally, I think it could be simpler still, but I would not know how to do that. Have you tried putting it in several contexts, like as icons of different sizes ? > And it harkens back to the very famous BYTE 1981 cover *without tying > Smalltalk to the past*. The hot air balloon motif for Smalltalk is > universally recognized, and we cannot ignore it. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/A-Logo-Proposal-for-Smalltalk-tp4945122p4947093.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
