> On 2 May 2017, at 16:33, horrido <horrido.hobb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, but can the lighthouse logo be used to represent all Smalltalks? I don't > think so. I like it very much, but the lighthouse has come to be closely > associated with Pharo.
I thought that was obvious: the lighthouse logo is Pharo, not Smalltalk - just to be very clear. I think a stylised balloon is not bad, it just has to be less complex, more logo like, more abstract. > Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote >>> On 2 May 2017, at 16:01, Esteban A. Maringolo < > >> emaringolo@ > >> > wrote: >>> >>> OTOH we have Pharo logo which is nice and unambiguous. >> >> Indeed, the following 2 are very nice, IMHO: >> >> http://files.pharo.org/media/logo/icon-512x512.png >> >> >> >> http://files.pharo.org/media/logo/icon-lighthouse-512x512.png >> >> >> Also, 'Smalltalk' is not one thing, just like 'Lisp' is not one thing. >> Both are families of technologies that have evolved over decades, with >> many different implementations both commercial and open source. >> >> Sven >> >> >> >> >> icon-512x512.png (127K) >> <http://forum.world.st/attachment/4945184/0/icon-512x512.png> >> icon-lighthouse-512x512.png (47K) >> <http://forum.world.st/attachment/4945184/1/icon-lighthouse-512x512.png> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/A-Logo-Proposal-for-Smalltalk-tp4945122p4945204.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
