Hi, > Am 21.03.2017 um 08:04 schrieb Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl>: > > On 19/03/17 14:14, Norbert Hartl wrote: >> I never managed to take a look at QCMagritte but it sounds as an extension. >> Why was it never integrated? > > It is rather a monolitical extension. And it was mostly in heavy development. > We never stopped to make a real release. Somehow the tutorial code and the > demo's were not enough to get traction in the community. Probably too much > change at a time. I think the design is sound but we never got into > discussions/feedback about that. > do you have any documentation that summarizes the changes you did. With all the new mails about magritte and problems it might be time to form a new group caring about a new implementation of a meta-object layer. I think now that we have slots the implementation can be made much more powerful than magritte is today.
> We ran into the instance side problem too, and solved that with > prototypes. You need them anyway to get better memento's. > Same here. There are times where it seems cumbersome to use the instance side descriptions. But the benefits outweigh that problem by far (for me at least). But I do like the idea that instance _and_ class side descriptions are taken into account. Feels right at first. Norbert
