> On 11 Feb 2017, at 09:41, lb <liangbin...@126.com> wrote:
> 
> Thank you, Sven
> gradually clear.
> 1. Symbol as String subclass, only guarantees a symbol object only one in 
> system, use ==;
> 2. keywords (selector name method name)  are spectial symbols, without space 
> or forbided characters;
> 3. perform: aSymbol, means perform: aKeyword,
>  Should we add asKeyword to String,
> let
> perform: aString asKeyword     
>  not
> perform: aString asSymbol ?

Good point, there has been discussion about a Selector class in the past, but I 
think the conclusion was, more or less, that it was not worth it (too much 
work/complexity for little gain).

> Regards!
> 
> Bing Liang
> 
> At 2017-02-11 15:51:49, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
> >Hi Bing,
> >
> >Yes, any character is allowed in a Symbol. There is even special syntax that 
> >allows such Symbols to be represented literally.
> >
> >'a b' asSymbol. 
> >
> >  => #'a b'
> >
> >Although it might be confusing, I don't see any problem.
> >
> >The concept of 'meaning' is defined by the user, the usage, not by the 
> >Symbol itself. A Symbol with a space cannot be a selector (message/method) 
> >name, but that does not mean a Symbol with a space could not be useful in 
> >some other context.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Sven
> >
> >> On 11 Feb 2017, at 05:56, lb <liangbin...@126.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> I know Symbol is subclass of String.        
> >> Any string object can become symbol object by sending 'asSymbol' message..
> >> I think  symbol must has its meaning in comon use, so the symbol should be 
> >> composed of alphabet or number ‘without space“.
> >> 
> >> BUT There are not compliant below
> >> 1.    '     ' asSymbol     >>>>    no meaning
> >> 2.  '$%%&' asSymbol     >>>>    no meaning
> >> 3.  'sign' asSymbol = 'sign ' asSymbol   >>>  false because of space.
> >> 3. '  one two  three ' asSymbol              >>>    I think It should 
> >> become three symbols = #one, #two, #three
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Mybe my understanding is wrong.
> >> 
> >> Bing Liang
> >> 
> >> 
> >
> >
> 


Reply via email to