A simple test for logos is: make it tiny (~20 pixels high = the favicon of a website) and it should still work (meaning it should be visible, legible, and recognizable). Even better if just a monochrome silhouette still works.
Try that with the logos of major brands. On 18 March 2016 at 19:30, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas < offray.l...@mutabit.com> wrote: > I share the impressions of Cyril here. The relation between the "P" and > the rest of the "illar" seems too much disproportionate. The second pillar > doesn't help with readability and I know about Pharo things kind of "sea" > related, but I would try to focus more on known pillars like [1] or [2] as > a base for abstractions instead of the ones behind the piers. Logos are > difficult and you're making a great work with the code, so is nice to that > you're taking the feedback also with the art of Pillar. > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Colonne-p1040009.jpg > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Schema_Saeulenordnungen.jpg > > Cheers, > > Offray > > > On 18/03/16 11:43, Cyril Ferlicot wrote: > > Hi, > > Personally I do not like it. (Maybe I'm difficult :) ). > > I think that it would be better to have the "illar" at the bottom and not > compressed in the middle. > > The second column look like an "y" and we read "Pillary". > > And why is there a wave under pillar? > I think that things in a logo have to be symbolic and I do not find > anything from the wave. > > Anyway, thank you to invest your time in pillar :) > > On Friday, 18 March 2016, Thibault ARLOING < <thibault.arlo...@hotmail.fr> > thibault.arlo...@hotmail.fr> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> With a mate, we've worked on a logo for Pillar. >> >> We just want feedbacks on it. >> >> >> You can fin the logo join files. >> >> >> thanks :) >> >> >> Good afternoon, >> >> Thibault >> > > > -- > Cheers > Cyril Ferlicot > > >
