On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> (a b c) = (b a c) if a = b
>>
>> (a b c) < (b a c) if a < b
>> The semantics are well defined.

A comparison between sequenceable collections compares each element in sequence.
This makes intutive sense.

> Since you mentioned JavaScript, you should know that you can't compare
> arrays with ==, because it does object comparison.

I don't understand the introduction of == to the argument. Its not
mentioned previously.

>> No. Sorted collection maintains order of its elements, and I'm talking
>> about order on [the set of] sequencable collections
>
> This will make sense only if the objects have overriden their #=.

It seems okay to me for the user to be responsible for ensuring
elements put into SequenceableCollection can be compared.

> Which also means that it is not very useful to use #<, because you can't
> define order without overriding #=.
>
> Compare it to sorting a collection, where you can either do #sorted, which
> will do "a <= b" by default, but you can still do #sorted: and specify the
> sort order, ditto with PluggableDictionary etc.
> So if anything, it would make more sense to be able to block-based testing
> (without relying on #<), because more often then not you will have your
> values wrapped in some (bigger) objects.
>
> And finally "Because in almost every programming language..." is not an
> argument.

Learning things from other languages *is* a reasonable argument, but
it should not be the major consideration.
cheers -ben

> You could argue that "1 + 2 * 3" should return "7", because that's how every
> language does it and that's how mathematicians did it for thousands of
> years. And yet Smalltalk happily returns "9" and yet it makes sense, and
> some could argue that it's even better.
>
> Peter
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> > I'd say it is questonable if SequenceableCollections should be
>> > comparable by default.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Alexandre
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to