Your use case (comparing containers using pluggable comparison for items) is pretty common.
And what I was suggesting won't solve that problem. However, it will make sequencable collections with comparable items comparable. That's it. If we have comparison defined for Point, why not have it for arrays? And no one forces you to define #= or #< for your objects if you don't want to. On 02.08.2015 20:23, Peter Uhnák [via Smalltalk] wrote: > > ... snip ... > -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Comparison-for-SequencableCollection-tp4840704p4840726.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
