No. Sorted collection maintains order of its elements, and I'm talking about order on [the set of] sequencable collections
On 02.08.2015 15:46, jtuchel [via Smalltalk] wrote: > Am 02.08.15 um 14:11 schrieb webwarrior: > > I was surprised when discovered that in Pharo comparison is not > defined for > > lists, arrays and similar datastructures. > > > > Because in almost every programming language (F#, Python, Javascript > just to > > name few) you can compare lists, arrays, etc. By convention, the > ordering is > > lexicographical, just like in strings. > > BTW: This would be SortedCollection, not OrderedCollection or its > superclass. > Still I am not convinced that I really need an implementation of #< in > SequencableCollection. Too many ways to interpret what greater or equal > or lower could mean... > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://forum.world.st/Comparison-for-SequencableCollection-tp4840704p4840706.html > > To unsubscribe from Comparison for SequencableCollection, click here > <http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4840704&code=cmVnQHdlYndhcnJpb3Iud3N8NDg0MDcwNHwzOTM0MDk5MzI=>. > NAML > <http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Comparison-for-SequencableCollection-tp4840704p4840709.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
